<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Standards Matter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/08/30/standards-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/08/30/standards-matter/</link>
	<description>Power Profitable Business Communities™</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: B2B Future or How to make things less complex &#171; Inovis Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/08/30/standards-matter/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>B2B Future or How to make things less complex &#171; Inovis Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 23:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/08/30/standards-matter/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>[...] just less complex. Currently all I hear from our customers is B2B Ecommerce is complex. There are too many standards (notice the comment on Jon&#8217;s post), too many technologies, multiple means of communication [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just less complex. Currently all I hear from our customers is B2B Ecommerce is complex. There are too many standards (notice the comment on Jon&#8217;s post), too many technologies, multiple means of communication [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Gatrell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/08/30/standards-matter/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Gatrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/08/30/standards-matter/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>You are right!   There is a good deal of complexity out there when it comes to standards.  The other item which is complex is that every implementation is different, even in a single standard.

Thanks for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right!   There is a good deal of complexity out there when it comes to standards.  The other item which is complex is that every implementation is different, even in a single standard.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Anderson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/08/30/standards-matter/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/08/30/standards-matter/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Jon
the biggest problem I see is there are more standards bodies than there are companies to support them. I think we need a standards for what constitutes a standard. Too many confusing agendas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon<br />
the biggest problem I see is there are more standards bodies than there are companies to support them. I think we need a standards for what constitutes a standard. Too many confusing agendas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
