<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Carbon Credits matter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/11/28/do-carbon-credits-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/11/28/do-carbon-credits-matter/</link>
	<description>Power Profitable Business Communities™</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mukundmohan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/11/28/do-carbon-credits-matter/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>mukundmohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/11/28/do-carbon-credits-matter/#comment-431</guid>
		<description>Very good points on both sides of the argument. Thanks for all the comments Tom, Matt and Bob. I agree 100% that its goodness to reduce our carbon footprint for the overall good. Reducing consumption is a good thing overall. I am just on the fence on the carbon credits portion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good points on both sides of the argument. Thanks for all the comments Tom, Matt and Bob. I agree 100% that its goodness to reduce our carbon footprint for the overall good. Reducing consumption is a good thing overall. I am just on the fence on the carbon credits portion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob LeMay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/11/28/do-carbon-credits-matter/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob LeMay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/11/28/do-carbon-credits-matter/#comment-430</guid>
		<description>I think that carbon offsets for businesses--if the offsets were regulated or monitored (who is proving that a business has really reduced their carbon emissions as much as they claim?)--but I think that carbon offsets for individuals is just another way for people with enough money to claim to be helping the environment when they don&#039;t actually look at their lifestyle.  

Case in point: Al Gore.  Multiple big homes (even if he and Tipper &quot;work&quot; out of ONE of their homes, do they really need 20,000 square feet?), lots of private jet travel, etc.  BUT he is &quot;carbon neutral&quot; because he buys offsets.  Well, if he lived in a smaller home (using less energy for construction, heating, cooling, lighting, etc.), flew commercial airlines more often, and modified his lifestyle in significant ways, he would need to purchase fewer carbon credits, leaving more for others, and ACTUALLY reducing his carbon footprint (not just &quot;offsetting&quot; it).

If most of the people buying offsets are actually DOING something to change their carbon output, more power to them.  But the ones making the most noise about it (celebrities, mostly) don&#039;t seem to be changing much.

Oh, and for a comparision of two &quot;celebrities&quot; who have some impact on the debate, see the urban legends website: 
http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl_tale_two_houses.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that carbon offsets for businesses&#8211;if the offsets were regulated or monitored (who is proving that a business has really reduced their carbon emissions as much as they claim?)&#8211;but I think that carbon offsets for individuals is just another way for people with enough money to claim to be helping the environment when they don&#8217;t actually look at their lifestyle.  </p>
<p>Case in point: Al Gore.  Multiple big homes (even if he and Tipper &#8220;work&#8221; out of ONE of their homes, do they really need 20,000 square feet?), lots of private jet travel, etc.  BUT he is &#8220;carbon neutral&#8221; because he buys offsets.  Well, if he lived in a smaller home (using less energy for construction, heating, cooling, lighting, etc.), flew commercial airlines more often, and modified his lifestyle in significant ways, he would need to purchase fewer carbon credits, leaving more for others, and ACTUALLY reducing his carbon footprint (not just &#8220;offsetting&#8221; it).</p>
<p>If most of the people buying offsets are actually DOING something to change their carbon output, more power to them.  But the ones making the most noise about it (celebrities, mostly) don&#8217;t seem to be changing much.</p>
<p>Oh, and for a comparision of two &#8220;celebrities&#8221; who have some impact on the debate, see the urban legends website:<br />
<a href="http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl_tale_two_houses.htm" rel="nofollow">http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl_tale_two_houses.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/11/28/do-carbon-credits-matter/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/11/28/do-carbon-credits-matter/#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Carbon offsets are a great tool after you have reduced as much as you can. TerraPass recently examined their consumers they found that they are more likely to have solar power, watch the thermastat and use public transportant. Offsets are great for what you can not reduce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carbon offsets are a great tool after you have reduced as much as you can. TerraPass recently examined their consumers they found that they are more likely to have solar power, watch the thermastat and use public transportant. Offsets are great for what you can not reduce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/11/28/do-carbon-credits-matter/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/11/28/do-carbon-credits-matter/#comment-424</guid>
		<description>Face the facts!

Yes, a lot of bull talked about Carbon issues. A lot of &quot;paper-shuffling&quot; but just remember this....in about 40 years time the Polar cap ( the one at the top of the Globe) may be gone.

So too may be the Polar bears. It took 25m years for bears to evolve from seals yet, in under 100 hundred years we are ruining their natural habitat.

I&#039;m not an Ecological &quot;nutter&quot; but we have to be aware of what we are leaving our children to deal with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Face the facts!</p>
<p>Yes, a lot of bull talked about Carbon issues. A lot of &#8220;paper-shuffling&#8221; but just remember this&#8230;.in about 40 years time the Polar cap ( the one at the top of the Globe) may be gone.</p>
<p>So too may be the Polar bears. It took 25m years for bears to evolve from seals yet, in under 100 hundred years we are ruining their natural habitat.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not an Ecological &#8220;nutter&#8221; but we have to be aware of what we are leaving our children to deal with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
