<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Question of the week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.inovis.com/2008/02/29/question-of-the-week-12/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2008/02/29/question-of-the-week-12/</link>
	<description>Power Profitable Business Communities™</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Are you EDI? at EDI Talk - Vendor Compliance and Electronic Data Interchange</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2008/02/29/question-of-the-week-12/#comment-1023</link>
		<dc:creator>Are you EDI? at EDI Talk - Vendor Compliance and Electronic Data Interchange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inovis.wordpress.com/?p=455#comment-1023</guid>
		<description>[...] on the Inovis blog - which I read as an Inovis customer - they posed an interesting question today - wondering why it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the Inovis blog &#8211; which I read as an Inovis customer &#8211; they posed an interesting question today &#8211; wondering why it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Dunham</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2008/02/29/question-of-the-week-12/#comment-1015</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Dunham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inovis.wordpress.com/?p=455#comment-1015</guid>
		<description>I missed the question from a few weeks ago.... But then again, can&#039;t relly know for sure how many paper transactions we&#039;re doing regularly that could be handled electronically....  but it&#039;s a lot, I&#039;m sure...

In an EDI group I belong to (EDI-L on Yahoo!), this concept kind of came up in an absract way - in that a question was posed regarding using X12 in banking, vs. using ACH and the costs involved....   A response included if they knew the concept of being &quot;penny-wise and pound-foolish&quot; to which somebody replied with a comment about the bueracracies involved in the banking world....

However, I replied, it&#039;s not something confined only to the banking world....  We all have our heads wrapped around the concepts of EDI and what it can do and what it can&#039;t do and the technology and processes behind it...  We all know what EDI can do for our companies....  The problem, however, exists in the &quot;other&quot; people... the non-tech, the non-MIS, the non-EDI people out there...  and explaining to THEM the benefits involved from going paperless, more or less...

The company I work for is over 50 years old.... in many ways, a lot of our processes and corporate thinking is also very dated....  it&#039;s not that they&#039;re being &quot;penny-wise and pound-foolish&quot;, as mentioned above, but it&#039;s more the &quot;if it ain&#039;t broke, don&#039;t fix it&quot; way of thinking.....

We started our EDI program back in 98 or 99... we were sending POs only, and only to about 40 of our vendors....  All that changed when I took over EDI in 2003, and now we&#039;re processing the 850 and the 856, as well as the 997 FAs.  I&#039;m working with Accounting to finally get them up and running on the 810 Invoice....  but it&#039;s been a long and hard trek to trod....

So, as to why more of our transactions are not done via EDI - &quot;it ain&#039;t broke&quot; - so it is not seen as anything of great importance....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed the question from a few weeks ago&#8230;. But then again, can&#8217;t relly know for sure how many paper transactions we&#8217;re doing regularly that could be handled electronically&#8230;.  but it&#8217;s a lot, I&#8217;m sure&#8230;</p>
<p>In an EDI group I belong to (EDI-L on Yahoo!), this concept kind of came up in an absract way &#8211; in that a question was posed regarding using X12 in banking, vs. using ACH and the costs involved&#8230;.   A response included if they knew the concept of being &#8220;penny-wise and pound-foolish&#8221; to which somebody replied with a comment about the bueracracies involved in the banking world&#8230;.</p>
<p>However, I replied, it&#8217;s not something confined only to the banking world&#8230;.  We all have our heads wrapped around the concepts of EDI and what it can do and what it can&#8217;t do and the technology and processes behind it&#8230;  We all know what EDI can do for our companies&#8230;.  The problem, however, exists in the &#8220;other&#8221; people&#8230; the non-tech, the non-MIS, the non-EDI people out there&#8230;  and explaining to THEM the benefits involved from going paperless, more or less&#8230;</p>
<p>The company I work for is over 50 years old&#8230;. in many ways, a lot of our processes and corporate thinking is also very dated&#8230;.  it&#8217;s not that they&#8217;re being &#8220;penny-wise and pound-foolish&#8221;, as mentioned above, but it&#8217;s more the &#8220;if it ain&#8217;t broke, don&#8217;t fix it&#8221; way of thinking&#8230;..</p>
<p>We started our EDI program back in 98 or 99&#8230; we were sending POs only, and only to about 40 of our vendors&#8230;.  All that changed when I took over EDI in 2003, and now we&#8217;re processing the 850 and the 856, as well as the 997 FAs.  I&#8217;m working with Accounting to finally get them up and running on the 810 Invoice&#8230;.  but it&#8217;s been a long and hard trek to trod&#8230;.</p>
<p>So, as to why more of our transactions are not done via EDI &#8211; &#8220;it ain&#8217;t broke&#8221; &#8211; so it is not seen as anything of great importance&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
