<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Supplier Left Behind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.inovis.com/2008/03/06/no-supplier-left-behind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2008/03/06/no-supplier-left-behind/</link>
	<description>Power Profitable Business Communities™</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: EDI &#38; Vendor Partnerships and Relationships - Take 2 at EDI Talk - Vendor Compliance and Electronic Data Interchange</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2008/03/06/no-supplier-left-behind/#comment-1038</link>
		<dc:creator>EDI &#38; Vendor Partnerships and Relationships - Take 2 at EDI Talk - Vendor Compliance and Electronic Data Interchange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inovis.wordpress.com/?p=465#comment-1038</guid>
		<description>[...] take that collaboration thought to another level. Over on that Inovis blog, they also posted about No Supplier Left Behind and how something called MMOG/LE (read their blog!) is being used in the Automotive Industry to try [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] take that collaboration thought to another level. Over on that Inovis blog, they also posted about No Supplier Left Behind and how something called MMOG/LE (read their blog!) is being used in the Automotive Industry to try [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meg Suggs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2008/03/06/no-supplier-left-behind/#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg Suggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inovis.wordpress.com/?p=465#comment-1035</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree with you more, Craig! Great comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more, Craig! Great comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Dunham</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2008/03/06/no-supplier-left-behind/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Dunham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inovis.wordpress.com/?p=465#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>While it may not have been &quot;e-commerce&quot; or &quot;EDI&quot; driven, Chrysler had worked some &quot;magic&quot; with many of their suppliers in the late 80s with a few car lines, working with suppliers to cut costs and improve lead times and all that to bring out a &quot;trim&quot; level of some of their &quot;older&quot; car lines....

The Dodge Omni and Plymouth Horizon - twin, small 4 door hatchbacks - and the Dodge Aries and Plymouth Reliant - twin, mid-sized 2 and 4 door sedans and a wagon - were built to the &quot;America&quot; label - offering a fixed price with certain levels of equipment and limited options.

In both cases, the cars had been in production for many years (over a decade for the Omni and Horizon) with limited changes.  Chrysler was able to work with their suppliers to cut costs and cut inventory of unused parts - maybe one of the first, major instances of JIT (just in time) manufacturing.

Through their programs, they were able to cut costs on manufacturing those cars, offering them at a lower price to the dealers, who, in turn, were able to offer them at lower prices to the customers....  I don&#039;t remember if the sales of those models increased because of the &quot;America&quot; program, but it probably worked very well, as they kept the &quot;America&quot; program and models around for a few years. 

But this was also well before the adoption of MMOG/LE.....

In any industry - whether an automaker or a dressmaker, retailer or wholesaler - suppliers and buyers need to work together - as PARTNERS - to improve their performances in ways that will affect and assist both PARTNERS - by allowing more information to flow and be used on both sides of the equation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it may not have been &#8220;e-commerce&#8221; or &#8220;EDI&#8221; driven, Chrysler had worked some &#8220;magic&#8221; with many of their suppliers in the late 80s with a few car lines, working with suppliers to cut costs and improve lead times and all that to bring out a &#8220;trim&#8221; level of some of their &#8220;older&#8221; car lines&#8230;.</p>
<p>The Dodge Omni and Plymouth Horizon &#8211; twin, small 4 door hatchbacks &#8211; and the Dodge Aries and Plymouth Reliant &#8211; twin, mid-sized 2 and 4 door sedans and a wagon &#8211; were built to the &#8220;America&#8221; label &#8211; offering a fixed price with certain levels of equipment and limited options.</p>
<p>In both cases, the cars had been in production for many years (over a decade for the Omni and Horizon) with limited changes.  Chrysler was able to work with their suppliers to cut costs and cut inventory of unused parts &#8211; maybe one of the first, major instances of JIT (just in time) manufacturing.</p>
<p>Through their programs, they were able to cut costs on manufacturing those cars, offering them at a lower price to the dealers, who, in turn, were able to offer them at lower prices to the customers&#8230;.  I don&#8217;t remember if the sales of those models increased because of the &#8220;America&#8221; program, but it probably worked very well, as they kept the &#8220;America&#8221; program and models around for a few years. </p>
<p>But this was also well before the adoption of MMOG/LE&#8230;..</p>
<p>In any industry &#8211; whether an automaker or a dressmaker, retailer or wholesaler &#8211; suppliers and buyers need to work together &#8211; as PARTNERS &#8211; to improve their performances in ways that will affect and assist both PARTNERS &#8211; by allowing more information to flow and be used on both sides of the equation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
