<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Question of the Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.inovis.com/2008/03/28/question-of-the-week-15/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2008/03/28/question-of-the-week-15/</link>
	<description>Power Profitable Business Communities™</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Craig Dunham</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2008/03/28/question-of-the-week-15/#comment-1104</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Dunham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inovis.wordpress.com/?p=502#comment-1104</guid>
		<description>Ooh! OOh!  (throwing My hand and arm in the air)... Pick Me!  Pick ME!!!!!

One of the things that I&#039;ve ALWAYS had an issus (albeit a minor issue!) is the &quot;standardization&quot; of screens - and it&#039;s in ANY software, not just the Inovis Trusted Link (i-Series) application I currently use....

But in &quot;Trading Partner Set up&quot;, I&#039;ve noticed that there is a difference in the field lengths between setting up &quot;send&quot; and &quot;receive&quot; relationship set ups.  For example, on the first screen of the set up, where you enter the &quot;document/message type and ID&quot; fields, on one side (send, I think), you type in the required information and the system will &quot;automatically&quot; pop over to the next entry field.  But on the other side (receive?), you have to hit the &quot;tab&quot; key to hit the next field.

There are probably other instances of this kind of lack of a standard field length, and it&#039;s completely minor, to be sure.  But it&#039;s just one of those things that, much like that princess and the pea, gets under your skin and stays there...

And as the child of a programmer (from WAY back) and having helped with system testing and looking for little &quot;issues&quot; like this, it&#039;s always been in My head when using ANY application.....

One of the other things I&#039;d mentioned during a phone conference with Murray Brook, was that when I&#039;m in the document center of TLi, there aren&#039;t that many documents shown on the screen (7, I think) and it makes searching through a long list more difficult to only have a few docs to view.  This leads to repeated hitting of the &quot;page down&quot; and &quot;page up&quot; keys. 

On that note, even allowing the &quot;HOME&quot; and &quot;END&quot; keys pop you to the top or bottom of the search list would be great too....  But even easier would be allowing use of a scroll-wheel mouse (which many of us have today) to scroll through the list, just as you can scroll through all of your e-mails in MS Outlook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh! OOh!  (throwing My hand and arm in the air)&#8230; Pick Me!  Pick ME!!!!!</p>
<p>One of the things that I&#8217;ve ALWAYS had an issus (albeit a minor issue!) is the &#8220;standardization&#8221; of screens &#8211; and it&#8217;s in ANY software, not just the Inovis Trusted Link (i-Series) application I currently use&#8230;.</p>
<p>But in &#8220;Trading Partner Set up&#8221;, I&#8217;ve noticed that there is a difference in the field lengths between setting up &#8220;send&#8221; and &#8220;receive&#8221; relationship set ups.  For example, on the first screen of the set up, where you enter the &#8220;document/message type and ID&#8221; fields, on one side (send, I think), you type in the required information and the system will &#8220;automatically&#8221; pop over to the next entry field.  But on the other side (receive?), you have to hit the &#8220;tab&#8221; key to hit the next field.</p>
<p>There are probably other instances of this kind of lack of a standard field length, and it&#8217;s completely minor, to be sure.  But it&#8217;s just one of those things that, much like that princess and the pea, gets under your skin and stays there&#8230;</p>
<p>And as the child of a programmer (from WAY back) and having helped with system testing and looking for little &#8220;issues&#8221; like this, it&#8217;s always been in My head when using ANY application&#8230;..</p>
<p>One of the other things I&#8217;d mentioned during a phone conference with Murray Brook, was that when I&#8217;m in the document center of TLi, there aren&#8217;t that many documents shown on the screen (7, I think) and it makes searching through a long list more difficult to only have a few docs to view.  This leads to repeated hitting of the &#8220;page down&#8221; and &#8220;page up&#8221; keys. </p>
<p>On that note, even allowing the &#8220;HOME&#8221; and &#8220;END&#8221; keys pop you to the top or bottom of the search list would be great too&#8230;.  But even easier would be allowing use of a scroll-wheel mouse (which many of us have today) to scroll through the list, just as you can scroll through all of your e-mails in MS Outlook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
