<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Change can be good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.inovis.com/2008/07/01/change-can-be-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2008/07/01/change-can-be-good/</link>
	<description>Power Profitable Business Communities™</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Craig Dunham</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2008/07/01/change-can-be-good/#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Dunham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inovis.wordpress.com/?p=629#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>Hmmm....  I can&#039;t bring Myself to endorse a single solution for our vendors - big OR small...!  I&#039;ve found too many times, supplier ABC uses &quot;brand X&quot; for EDI and, as mentioned above, I can&#039;t force them to choose just one - even if it&#039;s just for the cost effects Meg mentions above.  

I actually do have a fairly streamlined way of dealing with our suppliers - any of the 3rd party providers they use (whether Inovis or the competition) must have tested against our specs through our testing program (ironically, Inovis&#039;s Compliance Link) before becoming &quot;approved&quot;.

This helps our suppliers - which are quite a few of those SMBs (Small to Medium Businesses) - aka Mom n Pop shops - choose the best solution for their needs - whether based on cost, options, simplicity, or whatever - and makes all of use happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;.  I can&#8217;t bring Myself to endorse a single solution for our vendors &#8211; big OR small&#8230;!  I&#8217;ve found too many times, supplier ABC uses &#8220;brand X&#8221; for EDI and, as mentioned above, I can&#8217;t force them to choose just one &#8211; even if it&#8217;s just for the cost effects Meg mentions above.  </p>
<p>I actually do have a fairly streamlined way of dealing with our suppliers &#8211; any of the 3rd party providers they use (whether Inovis or the competition) must have tested against our specs through our testing program (ironically, Inovis&#8217;s Compliance Link) before becoming &#8220;approved&#8221;.</p>
<p>This helps our suppliers &#8211; which are quite a few of those SMBs (Small to Medium Businesses) &#8211; aka Mom n Pop shops &#8211; choose the best solution for their needs &#8211; whether based on cost, options, simplicity, or whatever &#8211; and makes all of use happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
