<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Inovis Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.inovis.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.inovis.com</link>
	<description>Power Profitable Business Communities™</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on A Vlog with David Fontaine on the Importance of Analysts by David Fontaine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/11/16/a-vlog-with-david-fontaine-on-the-importance-of-analysts/#comment-1444</link>
		<dc:creator>David Fontaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/11/16/a-vlog-with-david-fontaine-on-the-importance-of-analysts/#comment-1444</guid>
		<description>Jeremiah, thanks for your kind post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremiah, thanks for your kind post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Vlog with David Fontaine on the Importance of Analysts by Jeremiah Owyang</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/11/16/a-vlog-with-david-fontaine-on-the-importance-of-analysts/#comment-1442</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Owyang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/11/16/a-vlog-with-david-fontaine-on-the-importance-of-analysts/#comment-1442</guid>
		<description>Great video, you've really showcased the value of what makes the Analyst an important part of business relationships.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great video, you&#8217;ve really showcased the value of what makes the Analyst an important part of business relationships.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Vlog with David Fontaine on the Importance of Analysts by A Vlog with David Fontaine on the Importance of Analysts &#171; SageCircle Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/11/16/a-vlog-with-david-fontaine-on-the-importance-of-analysts/#comment-1437</link>
		<dc:creator>A Vlog with David Fontaine on the Importance of Analysts &#171; SageCircle Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/11/16/a-vlog-with-david-fontaine-on-the-importance-of-analysts/#comment-1437</guid>
		<description>[...] here or on the image to visit the Inovis blog to watch the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here or on the image to visit the Inovis blog to watch the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Vlog with David Fontaine on the Importance of Analysts by sagecircle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/11/16/a-vlog-with-david-fontaine-on-the-importance-of-analysts/#comment-1434</link>
		<dc:creator>sagecircle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/11/16/a-vlog-with-david-fontaine-on-the-importance-of-analysts/#comment-1434</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

SageCircle is new since this post. You can find our blog on AR and the analysts at

www.SageCircle.wordpress.com

A post related to your vlog is "Why technology buyers use the IT industry analysts"

http://sagecircle.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/why-technology-buyers-use-the-it-industry-analysts/

Cheers, -carter j</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>SageCircle is new since this post. You can find our blog on AR and the analysts at</p>
<p><a href="http://www.SageCircle.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.SageCircle.wordpress.com</a></p>
<p>A post related to your vlog is &#8220;Why technology buyers use the IT industry analysts&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://sagecircle.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/why-technology-buyers-use-the-it-industry-analysts/" rel="nofollow">http://sagecircle.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/why-technology-buyers-use-the-it-industry-analysts/</a></p>
<p>Cheers, -carter j</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disaster Recovery capability (hey, do you mean plan?) by Michael Dicosola</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/11/20/disaster-recovery-capability-hey-do-you-mean-plan/#comment-1429</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Dicosola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inovis.com/2007/11/20/disaster-recovery-capability-hey-do-you-mean-plan/#comment-1429</guid>
		<description>We were quoted at $37,000 for a disaster recovery linence. That is about $37,000 more then our other software providers. Why so high a price for somthing we probably will never use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were quoted at $37,000 for a disaster recovery linence. That is about $37,000 more then our other software providers. Why so high a price for somthing we probably will never use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Change can be good by Craig Dunham</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2008/07/01/change-can-be-good/#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Dunham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inovis.wordpress.com/?p=629#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>Hmmm....  I can't bring Myself to endorse a single solution for our vendors - big OR small...!  I've found too many times, supplier ABC uses "brand X" for EDI and, as mentioned above, I can't force them to choose just one - even if it's just for the cost effects Meg mentions above.  

I actually do have a fairly streamlined way of dealing with our suppliers - any of the 3rd party providers they use (whether Inovis or the competition) must have tested against our specs through our testing program (ironically, Inovis's Compliance Link) before becoming "approved".

This helps our suppliers - which are quite a few of those SMBs (Small to Medium Businesses) - aka Mom n Pop shops - choose the best solution for their needs - whether based on cost, options, simplicity, or whatever - and makes all of use happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;.  I can&#8217;t bring Myself to endorse a single solution for our vendors - big OR small&#8230;!  I&#8217;ve found too many times, supplier ABC uses &#8220;brand X&#8221; for EDI and, as mentioned above, I can&#8217;t force them to choose just one - even if it&#8217;s just for the cost effects Meg mentions above.  </p>
<p>I actually do have a fairly streamlined way of dealing with our suppliers - any of the 3rd party providers they use (whether Inovis or the competition) must have tested against our specs through our testing program (ironically, Inovis&#8217;s Compliance Link) before becoming &#8220;approved&#8221;.</p>
<p>This helps our suppliers - which are quite a few of those SMBs (Small to Medium Businesses) - aka Mom n Pop shops - choose the best solution for their needs - whether based on cost, options, simplicity, or whatever - and makes all of use happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All Aboard! by Craig Dunham</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2008/08/06/all-aboard/#comment-1425</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Dunham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inovis.com/?p=735#comment-1425</guid>
		<description>One of the things that needs to be considered - as mentioned by Meg and Bob - is that "rail infrastructure"...  Those grade-crossings, bridges, tunnels, routes and more....

But there is also a less "physical" infrastructure that needs to be considered to make rail - passenger or freight - more useful to the common man (and woman)....  of course, now tunes from Andrew Lloyd Webber's "STARLIGHT EXPRESS" are coursing through My head....

I currenly live in Southern California - a place KNOWN for major amounts of freeways, major amounts of truck traffic and two of the largest ports in the US, not to mention the world, the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.  Years ago, they constructed a rail corridor (known as the Alameda Corridor) to alleviate some of the truck traffic on the 710 freeway (a major north/south conduit) and to bring more rail into the process as well.

On the passenger front, we've got the Metro Rail - commuter trains - and the MetroLink passenger rail system.  They service many major areas and provide service to and from those areas for millions of commuters a day.

But here's where both of these HUGE systems fail - in that the services offered are limited.

For the cargo - the trains pull from the port and head north to many DCs and warehouses in the "eastern" LA area - up by I-10 (for those familiar with the LA area).  But what about all of the other industrial areas they pass by with other DCs and warehouses in Long Beach and other cities...?  Nope - no stops.

For the passenger - the closest station isn't all that close... or you have to go miles and miles out of your way to a station to catch another train to take you to another station to be able to finally catch a train to your destination... And the schedules - ha!  Don't even get Me started with those!

I had lived in the San Francisco Bay Area for many years - lived in the East Bay (Dublin) and worked in San Francisco, just off of Market Street.  And every day - unless I missed My "last" train to the city, I rode BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) to and from work.  If I missed the "last train" that could get Me to work on time, I drove....  But it was often hard to miss that "last train" as the schedule was so ... packed.  There were trains along some routes every 5 minutes....  Ok, maybe 10.  And when they got to a transfer point station - the trains on BOTH lines would hold for a few minutes, allowing you to go from a N/S line to an E/W line.  And the stations were easy to get to.

Mind you, some of the LA area stations are also easy to get to, but the schedules!

Bob spoke of the "physical" hurdles - but one also must think of the other hurdles - such as schedulling, locations, and destinations....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things that needs to be considered - as mentioned by Meg and Bob - is that &#8220;rail infrastructure&#8221;&#8230;  Those grade-crossings, bridges, tunnels, routes and more&#8230;.</p>
<p>But there is also a less &#8220;physical&#8221; infrastructure that needs to be considered to make rail - passenger or freight - more useful to the common man (and woman)&#8230;.  of course, now tunes from Andrew Lloyd Webber&#8217;s &#8220;STARLIGHT EXPRESS&#8221; are coursing through My head&#8230;.</p>
<p>I currenly live in Southern California - a place KNOWN for major amounts of freeways, major amounts of truck traffic and two of the largest ports in the US, not to mention the world, the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.  Years ago, they constructed a rail corridor (known as the Alameda Corridor) to alleviate some of the truck traffic on the 710 freeway (a major north/south conduit) and to bring more rail into the process as well.</p>
<p>On the passenger front, we&#8217;ve got the Metro Rail - commuter trains - and the MetroLink passenger rail system.  They service many major areas and provide service to and from those areas for millions of commuters a day.</p>
<p>But here&#8217;s where both of these HUGE systems fail - in that the services offered are limited.</p>
<p>For the cargo - the trains pull from the port and head north to many DCs and warehouses in the &#8220;eastern&#8221; LA area - up by I-10 (for those familiar with the LA area).  But what about all of the other industrial areas they pass by with other DCs and warehouses in Long Beach and other cities&#8230;?  Nope - no stops.</p>
<p>For the passenger - the closest station isn&#8217;t all that close&#8230; or you have to go miles and miles out of your way to a station to catch another train to take you to another station to be able to finally catch a train to your destination&#8230; And the schedules - ha!  Don&#8217;t even get Me started with those!</p>
<p>I had lived in the San Francisco Bay Area for many years - lived in the East Bay (Dublin) and worked in San Francisco, just off of Market Street.  And every day - unless I missed My &#8220;last&#8221; train to the city, I rode BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) to and from work.  If I missed the &#8220;last train&#8221; that could get Me to work on time, I drove&#8230;.  But it was often hard to miss that &#8220;last train&#8221; as the schedule was so &#8230; packed.  There were trains along some routes every 5 minutes&#8230;.  Ok, maybe 10.  And when they got to a transfer point station - the trains on BOTH lines would hold for a few minutes, allowing you to go from a N/S line to an E/W line.  And the stations were easy to get to.</p>
<p>Mind you, some of the LA area stations are also easy to get to, but the schedules!</p>
<p>Bob spoke of the &#8220;physical&#8221; hurdles - but one also must think of the other hurdles - such as schedulling, locations, and destinations&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All Aboard! by Meg Suggs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2008/08/06/all-aboard/#comment-1416</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg Suggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inovis.com/?p=735#comment-1416</guid>
		<description>Wow Bob, I didn't know about all of this train drama in Chicago! That is very interesting to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Bob, I didn&#8217;t know about all of this train drama in Chicago! That is very interesting to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seeking Sustainability by Meg Suggs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2008/08/04/seeking-sustainability/#comment-1415</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg Suggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inovis.wordpress.com/?p=732#comment-1415</guid>
		<description>Great points, Tom! It's not as easy being green as we'd all like. But I will say that I believe we're SLOWLY taking steps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points, Tom! It&#8217;s not as easy being green as we&#8217;d all like. But I will say that I believe we&#8217;re SLOWLY taking steps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All Aboard! by Bob LeMay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.inovis.com/2008/08/06/all-aboard/#comment-1411</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob LeMay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.inovis.com/?p=735#comment-1411</guid>
		<description>While I would like to see more rail traffic--both freight and passenger--I fear that the costs of increasing capacity will be too great.  There is a debate going on in the Chicago area about the possible purchase of the lightly used EJ&#38;E line on the far west side of the metropolitan area by CN (Canadian National), which could increase traffic by 6x (4-5 trains per day to 24-30 trains per day), but significantly reduce congestion through the city.  The affected communities--which, unlike many communities closer to Chicago, have never had significant rail traffic in recent years--are raising the specter of huge traffic delays, pedestrian deaths, etc.  The cost of grade separations (viaducts, bridges) is prohibitive, and each side wants the other to pay.

The latest is that CN is planning to sue to allow the sale to go through.

Until we can figure out how to make the public and private sectors work together on this, it will be slow going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I would like to see more rail traffic&#8211;both freight and passenger&#8211;I fear that the costs of increasing capacity will be too great.  There is a debate going on in the Chicago area about the possible purchase of the lightly used EJ&amp;E line on the far west side of the metropolitan area by CN (Canadian National), which could increase traffic by 6x (4-5 trains per day to 24-30 trains per day), but significantly reduce congestion through the city.  The affected communities&#8211;which, unlike many communities closer to Chicago, have never had significant rail traffic in recent years&#8211;are raising the specter of huge traffic delays, pedestrian deaths, etc.  The cost of grade separations (viaducts, bridges) is prohibitive, and each side wants the other to pay.</p>
<p>The latest is that CN is planning to sue to allow the sale to go through.</p>
<p>Until we can figure out how to make the public and private sectors work together on this, it will be slow going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
